Fortune Mods – Cars & Tanks & Vehicle packs
PATCHNOTES: *click* [ibb.co];
If the link goes down: (https ://ibb .co/J5Vx8ky);
Mod’s ratings and feedbacks: *click* [ibb.co];
If the link goes down: (https ://ibb .co/9gsWphn);
This is a complete mod pack that has a variety of cars for your personal usage.
Included many famous cars (59+ vehicles for your choice):
◉You need an armoured truck – WE HAVE ONE FOR YOU!
◉You need a rusty civilian car – WE HAVE ONE FOR YOU!
◉You need a fast sport/hyper car – WE HAVE ONE FOR YOU!
and many-many others. More than you can see on the preview.
Ready to get rid of crappy "Psycho" cars that punish your server with their poor quality?
Then our mods are just for you.
This mod is a ready-to-use WIP and will be updated and tweaked.
All Feedback is welcome as it will help me balance the vehicle and make it better for us all.
No repacks allowed.
You can use this mod on your monetized server and sell cars for ($) real money.
————————————————————————
————————————————
————————————————
Тогда наши модификации сделаны именно для вас.
Это полный пакет модов, в котором есть множество автомобилей! для вашего личного использования.
Включены все известные автомобили:
◉Вам нужна ржавая гражданская машина – она у нас есть.
◉Вам нужен быстрый спортивный/гиперкар – он у нас есть.
◉Вам нужен танк, который может стрелять – он у нас есть.
————————————————————————
Section 512(f) of the DMCA creates liability for knowingly making false claims in a DMCA takedown notice or counter-notice.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512
If someone claims in a takedown notice that you are infringing their copyrighted material while knowing this to be false, then you can win damages from them in a lawsuit. In recent years, the targets of wrongful takedowns have fought back and won damages and favorable settlements from individuals and companies sending bogus takedown notices. For instance, in Online Policy Group v. Diebold, Inc., 337 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (N.D. Cal. 2004), two students and their ISP sued voting machine manufacturer Diebold after it tried to use DMCA takedown notices to disable access to Internet postings of the company’s leaked internal email archive. The court granted summary judgment to the students and ISP on their claim, finding that portions of the email archive were so clearly subject to the fair use defense that "[n]o reasonable copyright holder could have believed that [they] were protected by copyright." According to the EFF, Diebold subsequently agreed to pay $125,000 in damages and fees to settle the lawsuit. For another example, see Crook v. 10 Zen Monkeys in our legal threats database. Someone who has sent a baseless takedown notice about your content may be more inclined to back off if you remind him or her about section 512(f) of the DMCA, in addition to sending a counter-notice.
